Course Reflection

This course (CS108) has been very informative helping students like me to learn a lot about many aspects of games such as history of games, definitions, game designs, game development process, new technologies both software and hardware based, etc. To be more specific the aspects I mentioned included a great variety of complex engines and tools available to us making it easier to create things such as art, entertainment, tools and utility programs as well as brining in some ideas and inspirations about potential future projects. Some of those projects have been developed by students to different degrees from rough pre-alpha stage prototypes to completely amazing and outstanding fully developed games and applications. Aside from acquiring and expanding a great amount of knowledge throughout this course, I have personally improved my skills in areas such as programming, writing(blogging), tools and applications usage via hands-on work. Thanks to our instructor, prof. James Morgan, this course has been very enjoyable and helpful :)

CarbonCraft

Main Menu

CarbonCraft is a collaborative educational game teaching kids about energy usage in the house. It is a game we have created on the topic of climate change and environmental sustainability.There are very few games in the climate change category of educational games. High quality climate change games are coming out but none have multiplayer elements. We understand that getting into schools is difficult, but our approach and partnership with curriculum developers will make entry easier. CarbonCraft is aimed towards middle school students. By seeing the changes that their decisions make they will be learning by doing rather than by taking tests. Based on how efficient their choices are, they will be rewarded with CarbonCoins to purchase upgrades for their home. The players will then be rated on their choices and given awards bavsed on how efficient their home is.

Kitchen and Player's UI

So far the plan is to make CarbonCraft a co-op game where players would be able to walk around the kitchen, pick up items and throw them into the baskets. Their first goal is to gather one item from each category on the checklist in order to cook breakfast with the most energy-efficient ingridinets possible. Each item has different characteristics of water consumption, waste it creates and CO2 it produces. Also, in order to keep electricity usage in check, a player has to turn off appliances which he/she doesn't use.

Minigame

 We have also added minigames, statistics and quizes to make the game more fun to play.

Statistics(beef production)

Quiz(Boss Fight)

GPS Games

PokemonGo(left: 3d virtual space; right: augmented rality)

Ingress and PokemonGo are GPS-based, augmented-reality games available on Android and iOS developed by Niantic where the latter can be considered a more advanced and more popular version of the former. The two games allow players to progress through the game via interaction between the real world and the virtual world. GPS-based games add some flavor to the process of playing because the virtual space is directly linked to real world through the locations which match in both worlds. When you move in the real world, you also move in the virtual world, though it's not possible to do that in reverse (^_^).

Ingress. In-game map.

I've played Ingress before. While there seems to be a variety of things to do like finding and hacking portals as well as spreading your faction's influence, the spectrum of actions playes can perform is very limited making the game being interesting in a short-term and boring in a long term. The only reason the game was interesting to me was because of the game's unique flavor of the two spaces, virtual and real, being related to each other.

Call of the Void (version 2)

Oops, the lanterns seem to be misaligned

In "Call of the Void" you are a ninja whose goal is to assassinate 3 guards who are guarding a mansion. There is a harmless boss too :) You get points for killing each guard. The maximum number of points you can get is 100. If the guards detect you, they will shoot at you since they have firearms and they don't like you. Believe me, you won't be able to dodge their bullets.
Compared to Alpha, this version has more guards with refined AI behavior and many more animations. Moreover, now you can die, restart the game, complete the game and recieve score.
Use arrow keys for movement/jumping. 'C' - to throw projectiles. 'Alt' - to teleport forward(this is kind of a cheat; if you get stuck inside of objects, try teleporting out).

Art: Robert Steiminger.
Programming: Andrei Voinov.

Link to the game's executable: GoogleDrive.

Call of the Void

The very beginning of the first level

"Call of the Void" is a side-scrolling game where you play as a ninja trying to sneak into a mansion and assassinate its owner. You will have to avoid areas with light or destroy light sources in order to make it easier for you to deal with guards who will try to kill you if you are detected. You can, however, kill the guards too, but keep in mind that you, as a ninja, have throwing weapons, whereas guards have firearms.

My role as a producer was to put in image assets into the game, convert them into usable sprites and make game objects based on those sprites. Objects' placement, collisions, player controls, animation triggers, AI behavior and physics were the things I have implemented and/or planning to implement.

The game's level hasn't been finished yet, so we are planning to place all kinds of objects and NPCs across the level to make it challenging and fun to complete it. Because there isn't much stuff in the game right now, there isn't much to test or play with. Other than that, once the game is finished, the major questions we would like to ask our players would be: is the game fun? Is the game challenging enough?

Link to the game's executable: GoogleDrive.

Video Games

"You Have To Burn The Rope" is an easy and quick to finish game with a little trick. In this game there is only one level with a boss. You, as a player, have to literally burn the rope in order to kill the boss and finish the game. Controls in this game a simple: you can move and jump around with arrow keys. Most of the letter keys on the keyboard would trigger a weapon throw, which is ironically useless in this game since those weapons don't do any damage to the boss. All of those things are mentioned in the beginning of the game in pure text form by the author of the game. Naturally, when seeing a game similar to those made in Game Maker, you would expect tools at your disposal to be useful, especially when to comes to killing a boss with weapons. However, in this game you simply have to follow the game's name and burn the rope to complete it(see Pic. 1).

Pic. 1. You Have To Burn The Rope

"WizardWizard" is a typical game with many levels and puzzles which one must complete in order to advance to the next level. There are 25 levels in this game with difficulty increasing with each level you pass. The controls are simple: you can jump, double jump and move with arrow keys. And that is all you need to do here. Your goal for every level is to obtain the key and open the door which leads to the next level. Even though a player can die from a fall into abyss or to a spinning cog, the death is not permanent and the player would respawn immediately and attempt to complete the level again. However, when the player dies, the deathcount increases by one. Note that each level's title provides a hint to or outlines the major obstacle in your path to finishing the level(see Pic. 2).

Pic. 2. WizardWizard

"This is The Only Level" is a game with only one physical level, but with dynamic mechanics which change with every stage of the same level passed. Things like gravity, controls, objects' and surfaces' characteristics vary with each stage with one or more things from the list changed on each stage. Even though the level's structure always looks the same, the objective, which is to reach the other end of the level, or rather escape the level, would be the same and in the same place. However, due to variation of all of the factors mentioned before, players experience different challenges throughout the stages of the game. The game tracks your time, and the number of deaths. Each stage has a title which is a hint to how to beat the stage(see Pic. 3).
"This is The Only Level" looks very similar to "WizardWizard" in terms of some mechanics objectives, and GUI. The first and most thing in common between both games is that there is no permanent death, while there is a deathcounter which counts number of times a player died. Both games have that counter in their graphical user interfaces. Second similarity is the simplicity of the controls. While controls in "This is The Only Level" might vary with stages, the general idea is that you can jump and move around with arrow keys just like in "WizardWizard". Third, each stage in both games has a character controlled by player in two-dimensional space, a spawn point and an objective which players have to reach in order to advance to the next stage/level. Fourth, GUIs in both games have a stage/level title which somehow relates to, or points out the challenge of that specific stage or level, sometimes making it easier for a player to find a way to complete the stage/level. Fifth, both games have two objectives players have to complete, though there are some exceptional stages in "This is The Only Level" where you don't have to complete one of the two objectives to proceed to the next level. In "WizardWizard" players have to obtain a key to open a gate leading to the next level, whereas in "This is The Only Level" players have to press a button first in order to open a path leading to the next level.

Pic. 3. This is The Only Level

XCraft the Board Game

XCraft is a board game about two to four powers fighting for control over an ancient artifact. Players represent and control the forces involved in this war. They can gather resources, build their armies, fight their opponents and capture control points around the artifacts. The ultimate goal of this game is to take control of all 6 control points around the ancient artifact. Only one player can become a winner.
This game has gone through three stages of development with one play session per each stage. When the first version of game was built, there were some uncertainties about what values should be used for resource gathering, producing workers and warriors and limits to players' actions per turn. Since there were only two players available for the first play test, the game board was drawn for just two players(see Pic. 1). In the first version of the game the game's pace was extremely slow. Due to the game objective being too difficult to achieve and some balance issues with resources' conversion rates, it became almost impossible for players to finish the game. There were 16 control points for players to capture to finish the game. It would've taken a lot of time to capture all 16 control points, but the game can only be won if a single player captures all of those points which, under constant pressure and fierce attacks from the second player proved to be impossible.

Pic. 1. First version of the game board

Because the first version failed as a winnable game, there were changes made to the number of control points around the objective making it 6 instead of 16 and the resource gathering amounts as well as cost of units. The second version of the game introduced limits to how many actions players can take each turn making it 2 actions per turn with certain rules for how those actions can be utilized. The speed at which players could build their armies increased, which made fights between the players to occur earlier in the game and more often throughout the game ovrall. These changes significantly sped up the game's pace; however, they were not enough to make the game's goal achievable within reasonable time frame. In other words, the game still took too long to finish. The major problems with the second version were that there were too many fields that players' armies had to cover in order to get to the objective. On top of that, the number of fields around the board was bit chaotic and unbalanced favoring some players over the other(see Pic. 2).

Pic. 2. Second version of the game board(graphical representation)

Changes made in the third version of the game were mostly focused on the game board's layout. The 6 core control points around the objective were numbered from 1 to 6 and each player, when rolling a die, could choose to instantly move his/her warrior unit to one of the six control points depending on the number rolled. This meant that all players could get to the objective without having to cover big distances and instantly occupy a control point. If a control point is occupied then another player who also wants to jump to that spot would have to fight the player in control of the point. In addition, the paths leading to the control points were rearranged making it easier for players to reach the objective. The more players play the game, the longer it takes to finish it, but, at the very least, after two iterations of changes to the game, it became winnable.
Here are some shots from the final play session(game's version #3) with 4 players(see Pic. 3 and Pic. 4). There are still some issues with the balance of the game in terms of layout of the board and the location of control points, but the third version of the game is much better than the last two.

Pic. 3. Third version of the game(1st turn)

Pic. 4. Third version of the game(n^th turn)

Forbidden Island

Pic. 1. Initial Setup

Once upon a time, Explorer, Engineer, Messenger and Pilot discovered Forbidden Island. Unknowingly to them, the four slightly adjusted the laws of nature on the island making their hunt for treasures a bit easier than it would normally be. The island started to sink at a "normal" speed. Explorer was the most active one among the four in terms of distance covered by foot. He kept searching for treasures at a fast pace while keeping himself dry. Engineer was working hard day and night shoring up parts of the island. He was stubborn and unwilling to let even a single piece of land to sink on his watch. As a true friend and the most generous person among the four, Messenger continued to give away his pieces of treasure maps to his comrades throughout their journey. Pilot slowly proceeded through the wilderness recovering treasures the surface and assisting others in the process. When all the treasures were recovered, all four flew to the landing pad and were successfully evacuated from Forbidden Island.

Pic. 2. Farewell Forbidden Island

Starring: Michael Nguyen as Explorer, Kevin Bui as Engineer, Eldon Lee as Messenger, Andrei Voinov as Pilot.

Results: 5 tiles sunk, 12 tiles flooded, water level: 5(2 levels before the apocalyptical flood), 4/4 treasures recovered, 4/4 players survived. Victory!

Game Rules: http://gamewright.com/gamewright/pdfs/Rules/ForbiddenIslandTM-RULES.pdf
Boardgamegeek link: https://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/646456/forbidden-island

Prince Of Persia [DOS]

Pic. 1. Prince of Persia ... examining a spike trap

First, you have to experience ... death! Well, that's how you learn the ways to play most of the video games, which allow one to die, anyway. The game I would like to talk about is Prince Of Persia. Do not confuse it with the game of the same name developed by Ubisoft in 2008. This one is special because, first of all, it was developed in 1989, and, second of all, it was initially developed for Apple II and later ported to other operating systems. I've played it before on MS-DOS.

So you play ... as a guy who is trying to save princess from a terribly evil person whom you have to defeat at the end of endless dungeons full of traps and guards. To do so, you have to ... die ... infinite number of times until you remember where all the traps are, learn how to fight the guards with a sword, which you don't have initially. I mean, I can get to the point where I grab a sword, but when I encounter the first guard he kills me ... so sad. Overall, the game is good - simple movement controls such as arrow keys to climb up and down, jump, run; not so simple swordplay; simple scenario - save princess X, and beat boss Y; a numbers of not so unexpected deaths.

As for how experience of playing this game in an emulator compares to that of playing it on the actual DOS-running computer, I would say that I haven't noticed any differences between them. Because MS-DOS is technically a predecessor to MS-Windows operating system, there haven't been any issues with mismatching controls, run-time errors or any kind of performance problems since, apparently, compatibility between the two is high, though the emulator plays the biggest role of all by simulating a functioning DOS operating system.

References: http://playdosgamesonline.com/prince-of-persia.html